Rewatching the Georgia Alabama 2017 National Championship Game, aka, the “Tua” Game

Before I started watching NFL draft prospects over the past week or so, we were in that dry period of the offseason where there’s not much going on. So over the last few weeks, I’d been rewatching certain College Football games. I mostly was rewatching LSU from last year, just because Joe Burrow and that offense were really fun to watch. But one of the games I also decided to watch was the Georgia Alabama National Championship Game from 2017, the first season I started watching College Football. It was only three years ago, but a lot has changed since then. This was the game where Tua Tagavailoa burst onto the scene, replacing Jalen Hurts at halftime to bring the Tide back to a spectacular 26-23 overtime victory. Up until that point, Tua had been a relatively unknown backup. A lot happened in the College Football world since then. Rewatching the game, both knowing the result of that game already but also knowing everything that’s happened since then, was an interesting exercise, and I left with a few interesting takeaways that I thought I’d share.

The Matchup: Georgia vs Alabama


As I mentioned earlier, three years is an eternity when it comes to College Football. Barring exceptions, NCAA Division I Athletes typically only have four years to play football in a five year span. They are allowed to forego their senior year to declare for the NFL draft after their junior (third) year. So lots of players won’t play all four years, and if they do, rarely is it all at one school. Because of all this, it’s a sport with yearly turnaround, where people are always looking ahead to the next batch of recruits, the next biggest thing. And you see that with this game: Georgia Quarterback Jake Fromm and Alabama Quarterback Tua Tagavailoa were both true freshman in this game, just stepping onto the scene. Now, they’re both preparing for the NFL draft in a few weeks. So is Jalen Hurts, who started the 2017 season for Bama as a true sophomore before being benched at halftime of the natty for Tua. Many of the players on those Georgia and Alabama teams also went forward to be NFL stars in the past few years.

So what led to this matchup during the 2017 season? It wasn’t by any means a shocking matchup, as these were two very good teams, but it certainly wasn’t the matchup that everyone was expecting throughout the season. In fact, Bama almost didn’t make the playoff in the first place. Despite a dominant start to the season, Bama entered the playoff as the fourth and final seed, and they didn’t do so without controversy. Many people believed that Ohio State was more worthy of the final playoff spot than Bama, as Bama stayed home during Championship Weekend after a late season loss to Auburn, while Ohio State was crowned the Big 10 Champion with a win over Wisconsin. During that Championship Weekend, Auburn seemed to me to be the clear SEC favorite for the contest, as they had already defeated heavyweights Alabama and Georgia during the regular season, the only defeat of the season for both of those programs. The Georgia defeat was a resounding 40-10 win by Auburn, which is why it was surprising when Georgia beat Auburn 28-7 in the SEC Championship rematch. That Georgia team was also a bit of a surprise, as true freshman QB Jake Fromm took over early on for the injured sophomore Jacob Eason (a 5 star recruit), and went on to have a fantastic season for Georgia. Georgia’s first playoff contest was a fantastic Rose Bowl shootout with Baker Mayfield and the Sooners. Although Mayfield, the eventual Heisman Winner, was all the rage that season with a seemingly unstoppable offense, it was Georgia that came out on top of the shootout in a double overtime victory. As for Bama, after the committee gave them the okay over Ohio State for the fourth playoff spot, they made easy work of No 1 ranked Clemson 24-6. The final matchup was set: Georgia vs Bama. Neither of them were flashy teams, as both relied on a run game, game-manager style QB, and good defense to win. Because of that matchup and those teams’ style of play, the Championship ended up being a bit lower scoring than we would see in the next few seasons. Nonetheless, it was a great, close game that came down to the wire and had a fabulous finish.

Georgia Was Loaded


Although Georgia made it to the SEC Championship in 2018 and 2019, 2017 was their only playoff appearance of the last three years. They had a lot of talent, but most impressive to me was the two headed running back combo of Nick Chubb and Sony Michel, which powered Georgia throughout that playoff run. Both of them would go on to be stars in the NFL. Nick Chubb is currently the foundation back for the Cleveland Browns, and although that offense struggled last year, he runs hard and certainly looks the part. Sony Michel didn’t have the best 2019, but his 2018 season saw the Patriots employ a run first attack with Michel as the lead dog–especially during the playoffs–that ultimately led the Pats to their sixth Super Bowl ring, which might have been their most surprising yet.

Georgia also had playmaker WR Mecole Hardman at the helm on offense and returning kicks. Hardman played for Georgia during 2018 as well, and in 2019, he was drafted by the Kansas City Chiefs and would go on to help Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes win their first Super Bowl ring each.

And lastly, there was dominant middle linebacker Roquan Smith, who was eventually drafted high by the Chicago Bears and helped solidify their defense along with Khalil Mack. It was a Georgia team with a lot of big time players, and it’s always fun to look back and see successful NFL guys back in their college days. You never know where those guys are going to end up or what they’re going to do when you’re watching them while they’re still in college.

Nick Saban’s Decision to Put Tua in at the half was a Ballsy Move


Halftime of the National Championship saw Bama face a 13-0 deficit with very little offensive production to speak of. That’s when Nick Saban made a move that ultimately won him a championship but at the time seemed crazy: He pulled his starting QB in favor of a true freshman that had never started a game before. Jalen Hurts, the incumbent starter, was 20-2 as a starter. His only losses were that year’s game at Auburn, and the previous year’s National Championship. During the 2016 Championship, Hurts gave his team a late lead, only for Deshaun Watson to pull Clemson ahead with zeros on the clock.

Hurts was well respected in the Bama locker room, among fans, and in the media. Furthermore, he didn’t even have that bad of a half. The offense as a whole struggled, especially up front, and Hurts’s rushing yards gave them some of their only offense of the half. It was a brutal benching for Jalen. Nonetheless, Tua was the better passer, and Saban said he felt Bama needed to pass the ball to win. 

Bama would come back and just squeeze out the win, despite Georgia seemingly in control time and time again. Tua ended up being the playmaker, bringing Bama back in the game, throwing a miraculous game tying TD pass on 4th down late in the fourth quarter, and throwing maybe an even more miraculous TD pass in overtime to seal it. Kirk Herbstreit said that Tua’s presence gave Bama a spark. The “spark” theory is that a QB change can impact and motivate the rest of the team to play better when they’re in a slump, even if the incumbent QB isn’t all to blame. In this case, that ended up being true. 

If Georgia won, we’d probably be looking at Saban’s decision to bench Jalen for Tua very differently. But you have to take the big risks in big games when the time calls for it in order to come out on top. It’s somewhat reminiscent of Sean Payton’s decision to start the second half of Super Bowl 44 with an onside kick. An insane decision, but one that ultimately paid off. As NFL Coach Bruce Arians (whose book I’m currently reading) always says, “No risk it, no biscuit.”

This Game Was a Grind


Ultimately, this was the biggest takeaway to me. Because of Tua’s late game heroics, and because of what he’s done since this game, I remembered this game as being a phenomenal performance by him. And it was, but it wasn’t like the next few years, where Bama would put up an automatic 40 points and 300 yards every time you played them. This game was not an aerial circus. The comeback was fueled by Bama running the ball well, some good run after the catch by Bama receivers (Tua had a lot of WR screens and passes thrown to the flat), good defense, and Tua keeping the chains moving. But for much of the second half, it was a defensive battle, and it could have gone either way. It was a good game and a good performance by Tua, but it wasn’t aerial fireworks.. at least not until the end.

Georgia Got Conservative Late


Georgia started this game with a 13-0 lead at halftime. It was a surprising performance from the newbie coach (Kirby Smart) against the savvy veteran coach and team in Bama and Nick Saban. Kirby is Nick Saban’s protege, and he, like Saban, believes in winning with the run game and defense. But he also knew that that would be a struggle against an Alabama defense. So Georgia started the game with more of a spread passing attack, with Jake Fromm attacking Bama through the air on early downs with quick passes and tempo on offense. And it caught Bama off guard. Fromm was sharp, and Georgia was moving the ball efficiently and scoring.

At the half, Tua was able to give Bama some offense and brought them back into the game with a phenomenal drive, cutting the deficit to 13-7. Georgia would eventually answer. On 3rd down and long, Georgia was backed up on their own side of the field. Bama decided to come with the blitz, and Georgia made them pay. For one of the few times that game, Georgia went deep and was able to get behind the defense. Jake Fromm hit Mecole Hardman in stride, and he took it to the house, 20-7.

Georgia didn’t score again until overtime. Bama crawled their way back into the game, hitting on a field goal and another field goal to eventually make it a one score game, before Tua brought them down the field late. But Georgia didn’t score on something like their final 4 drives. The offense had stalled from their hot start early on.

This is where it gets complicated. Throughout the season, Georgia had never been a team to throw the ball a ton and win shootouts. With the lead, they were playing the game on their terms. They simply wanted to run the ball and end the game, and they weren’t able to do so. If they had passed the ball more and failed, they likely would have gotten more criticism. It’s always less controversial to fail in conventional ways than take chances. Look at all the criticism Kyle Shanahan has gotten in recent Super Bowls from choosing to pass the ball at times late in those games.

However, I couldn’t help but notice that Georgia really had Bama’s number early in the game. Jake Fromm was sharp, the offense was moving, and Bama was on their heels trying to defend the tempo and short passes on early downs. It seems to me that by slowing things down and getting more conservative late, Georgia played into the hands of the Bama defense. It allowed Bama’s defense to dominate up front, which is where they had the advantage. Again, this conversation may be different if Tua doesn’t make a few miracle plays late. Maybe Georgia didn’t trust Fromm as much after the interception, I don’t know. But seeing as how things did play out, Georgia’s conservative play-calling certainly seemed to keep Bama in the game. And you can’t do that against a championship caliber team like Bama; you have to go hard for 60 minutes.

Bama Was in Position to Win Twice


This was actually one thing I did remember from watching the first time around. We know that Bama pulled off the miraculous overtime victory, but what people may not remember is they also had a chance to win in regulation. Tua and Najee Harris took Bama down the field late, and Bama’s kicker Andy Pappanostous missed the field goal badly wide left. As anyone who’s familiar with College Football knows, Bama is no stranger to missed field goals.

Bama Almost Blew It


What most people remember is Tua’s 41 yard touchdown pass in overtime to win the game. It was a dart down the sideline to Devonta Smith for the walkoff touchdown. But on the play before that, Tua took an awful sack. He tried to escape the rush instead of throwing the ball away, and he lost a whopping 16 yards on the play. That Bama was able to come back and throw the game winner right after that is what made that moment all the more incredible.

Georgia Blew It On Defense


The game winning touchdown was mostly looked at as an incredibly play by Tua and the Bama offense, and rightfully so. A 41 yard walkoff touchdown down the sideline with two true freshmen is definitely the stuff of legends. Having said that, it’s not entirely clear what Georgia was thinking on the play.

As always, you have to start with the situation. It’s overtime. Alabama is backed up at their own 41 after a big sack taken by Tua. It’s 2nd and 26, and Bama had the ball second in OT after Georgia kicked a field goal. That means that on this possession, Bama had three options. They could win with a touchdown, tie with a field goal, or lose with a turnover. Georgia’s number 1 priority was keeping Bama out of the endzone.

I don’t know exactly what defense Georgia was playing, but it looked like some sort of cover 2. They had two safeties deep, and a couple of linebackers playing short zone. Kirk Herbstreit, when analyzing the play, focused on what a great job Tua did looking off the safety so as to give himself a window to hit Devonta Smith down the field. And that’s true; Tua did bring the safety out of position on the play with his eyes. But more alarming to me is how Georgia let Devonta Smith run by the defense. Smith starts to the outside ever so slightly, then slips back inside the cornerback, and by then the corner is toast. Smith is running full speed at the corner, and he beats him by quite a few yards. The corner doesn’t jam Smith, but he also starts the play backpedaling, ensuring that he has no chance at covering a streaking Smith down the sideline. 

Maybe the corner was expecting more help from the safety. But if you’re Georgia, why are you playing this defense when you have Bama backed up in OT? Your only job is to not get beat deep. On 2nd and 26, even if Bama gets half the first down yardage, Georgia is still in good position to make a hold. That means you play super soft and make Bama throw underneath. Instead, Georgia accomplishes close to nothing with their underneath defenders, and forces their lone two deep defenders to accomplish the impossible task of covering the width of the field. If you don’t want to play soft, you blitz and get there. Or if you want to play cover 2, you have your corners jam the receiver to buy your pass rushers some time. But a passive cover 2, without top level NFL corners, will give you the deep sideline throw 99% of the time. That’s especially true in college, where the hash marks are wider and the safeties have more ground to cover.

The only explanation here is that Georgia knew Bama didn’t trust their kicker, and they didn’t want to let Bama throw intermediate to let him back in field goal range. Or, they simply didn’t trust the freshman QB to throw deep (or anticipate that he would). Whatever the explanation, it certainly looks like a coverage bust in retrospect, and one that cost Georgia the game at that.

Rodrigo Blankenship Was Clutch… But Hasn’t Always Been Since Then


Rodrigo Blankenship, Georgia’s superstar kicker, nicknamed “Hotrod” and famous for his black-rimmed eyeglasses, burst onto the scene for Georgia that 2017 season. A former walk-on, Blankenship won the kicking job in 2016, and Kirby Smart put him on scholarship in 2017–a fact that Blankenship announced to a jubilant team in the locker room after booting the go ahead field goal during that season’s win at Notre Dame. Since then, Blankenship has been a favorite both among fans and among the team. 

Blankenship only continued to cement his legacy during the 2017 Rose Bowl, Georgia’s win against Oklahoma. It was the semifinal matchup of the playoff contest, and Blankenship nailed a Rose Bowl record 55 yard field goal before the half. He was just as spectacular in the championship game against Bama, going 3/3 on field goals of 41, 27, and 51 yards. The 51 yarder was in overtime.

Blankenship peaked statistically in 2017, but he remained productive throughout his UGA tenure. He won the Lou Groza award after his senior (2019) season, and is set to be the top kicker in the upcoming draft. But I couldn’t help but notice that in the few years after, he had a few crucial misses in big games.

During Georgia’s 35-28 SEC Championship loss to Alabama in 2018, Blankenship missed his only field goal attempt of the day, a relatively short 30 yarder in the third quarter. Georgia was leading 28-14 at the time, and the kick would have stretched their lead to three scores. Fast forward to this past season, and Blankenship again struggled in the SEC Championship, this time to LSU. During the 37-10 loss, he went 1/3 on field goals, missing a 52 yarder down 7-0 in the first quarter, and a 37 yarder down 20-3 in the third. That’s two straight years of SEC Championships where the normally reliable kicker had uncharacteristic misses. The worst of last year was Georgia’s home loss to an eventual 4 win South Carolina team. Jake Fromm had a terrible day throwing the football, throwing three interceptions, one of which went the other way for six. Blankenship had a chance to tie up the game in OT, but pulled the 42 yarder left, ending the game. It was a bad kick, one that a kicker the caliber of Blankenship has to make.

Of course, this is all too small a sample size to draw any definitive conclusions from, and Blankenship is still a terrific kicking prospect. But I felt it worth noting.

Jake Fromm and Georgia Never Got Back


Georgia’s been a fun team to root for in recent years. As I mentioned, their head coach Kirby Smart was a former Nick Saban (Bama) disciple, and both in the 2017 championship game and in the SEC since, they’ve been easy to look upon as the “good guy” young resistance to Saban’s reigning empire. Jake Fromm, their quarterback, has also been a very likable guy and someone easy to root for after he took over the starting job in 2017. And Smart, by most measures, has done a fantastic job with this Georgia program since taking over. But he, and they, haven’t been able to get over the Bama hump and become the new leaders of the SEC. And 2017 was the closest they got. 

That Championship loss was a heartbreaker. They gave up leads of 13-0, 20-7, and watched a true freshman QB who had never played a meaningful college snap toss the game winner in overtime. What makes it even more painful is that the following year was arguably even more heartbreaking. Georgia was facing off against Bama again during the 2018 season, this time during the SEC Championship game. Again, Georgia had a big lead–this time 28-14–in the third quarter, only to watch it melt away once again. Bama came back to win 35-28, ending Georgia’s Championship hopes. In a strange bit of irony, Tua Tagavailoa was the starter in this game, but he left the game due to injury, and the now backup Jalen Hurts of all people, came back to win the game for Bama. It was the opposite of what happened the previous year, but the result was the same. Georgia had Bama right where they wanted, but they weren’t able to finish.

Fast forward to 2019, and LSU, not Bama, was now the class of the SEC. They played Georgia in the SEC Championship and dominated them 37-10. Georgia’s defense actually played LSU decently, but the Georgia offense was out of sync from the start, as had been the case for most of the season. 

It must be painful for Georgia fans to look back over the past three years knowing just how close they were. For as good as Jake Fromm was for this program, and as good as he played at times against Bama, he wasn’t able to bring Georgia a championship.

But Neither Did Bama


This is actually arguably the more interesting storyline to come out of this game. This win seemed to mark the turning of the tide (no pun intended) for Bama. For years, Bama had been the best team in college football under head coach Nick Saban. This championship win would give the program 5 national championships in just 9 years under Saban, a remarkable number. But they never won with elite, high volume passing offenses. They won by playing good defense, running the ball, and having game managers at QB. Now with Tua at the quarterback position, the possibilities for Bama were endless. I remember Kirk Herbstreit talking about it on his ESPN podcast after the game. He said that for most of 2017, Bama had to grind out wins, often just sneaking by in the 4th quarter. And he was right. 2017, despite the eventual championship, was not a great Bama team. Remember that they made the playoffs as the 4 seed and were almost left out entirely. But now with Tua throwing the football, defenses were going to have it rough the next few years. 

On some level, this was correct. Tua would go on to have two of the best passing seasons not just in Bama history, but in college football history. The Bama offense was stacked, and Tua was unstoppable. If he hadn’t gotten injured late in 2019 and Joe Burrow hadn’t emerged out of nowhere, Tua would likely be a consensus No 1 overall pick in the upcoming draft. Which makes it all the more crazy that Bama didn’t win another Championship with Tua after his 2017 breakout win.

By normal college football standards, Bama has been a top tier program the past two years. They’ve only lost three games total, and one of those was a championship game. But Bama, much like the New England Patriots, plays solely to win Championships. Anything short is a failure. Nick Saban would be the first one to tell you that, and he said as much after this year’s Citrus Bowl win over Michigan.

Bama may have had a historic passing offense under Tua, but with that, the defense has not played up to its usual standard. Bama has historically been known for having the best defense in college football. Here is how they fared in their three crucial losses over the past two years:

First, the 2018 National Championship game, the subsequent year Tua’s 2017 breakout win: Bama got routed by Clemson, losing 44-16. It was the worst loss of Nick Saban’s career. This past year, Bama’s first loss of the season was the game of the year, where they hosted the surging LSU Tigers. Bama lost 46-41. Defending Joe Burrow sure isn’t easy, but this wasn’t the type of performance you’d expect from Bama. After that loss, Bama could not afford another loss and still make the playoff due to their weak strength of schedule. Their final regular season game saw them go into Auburn and lose 48-45. Although you could point to Bama’s missed field goal towards the end, as well as Guz Malzahn’s trick play to run out the clock late as culprits for the loss, Bama has no business giving up 48 points to an average true freshman QB–no matter how weird things have gotten for them at Jordan Hare over the years.

Ultimately, Bama will have netted zero championships from their two greatest offenses in their history. That’s a problem, and it makes you wonder if Nick Saban’s era of dominance in college football is over. Things may be shifting toward Clemson (and maybe LSU) as the new SEC powerhouses.

It’s a reminder that great offense isn’t worth much if you can’t complement it with great defense. Bama isn’t likely to go back to playing conservative on offense with game managers at QB. They continued running their offense as usual with Mac Jones last season after Tua was hurt, and they have five star Bryce Young set to takeover at QB next year, an incredibly highly recruited player who should be a monster. They also have Tua’s younger brother on the roster, who is also a QB.

At the end of the day, Bama fans likely can’t look at Tua’s two full years starting at Bama without seeing them as missed opportunities. If Bama wants to get back to playing to their standard of football, they’re going to have to show up on defense in the big games.


What was once seemingly the beginning of the road for two great programs is now the end. Jake Fromm and Tua move onto the NFL Draft, and it begins a new era for Georgia and Bama. As for the games we watched last year during college football, as well as the ones we’ll see this upcoming year, it’s interesting to wonder how we’ll look back at those games years from now, whether or not our expectations will have matched up with reality, and what unexpected twists and turns will have occurred along the way.

Revisiting the College Football Playoff’s Alabama/Ohio State Decision

Exactly three months ago today, the College Football Playoff Selection Committee released their final team rankings for the 2017 College Football season, determining who would be included and who would be left out of the 2017-18 College Football Playoff. The Clemson Tigers, Oklahoma Sooners, Georgia Bulldogs, and Alabama Crimson Tide were selected to participate in the 4 team playoff for the National Championship. Alabama ultimately went on to win it all in historic fashion. They took down the first ranked Clemson Tigers 24-6, before rallying back down 20-7 to defeat the SEC Champion Georgia Bulldogs 27-23 in OT. They did so behind the play of their (then) backup Quarterback Tua Tag Tagovailoa, as Head Coach Nick Saban made the gutsy decision to pull his starting QB, Jaylen Hurtz, after being down 13-0 at Halftime. Tua rallied them back and threw the Game Winning Touchdown Pass in OT.

All in all, it was a spectacular finish to to the College Football Season. And for Alabama, it was their fifth National Championship Win in nine years, all under Nick Saban. Yet the aura surrounding the conclusion to that game seemed to almost entirely overshadow the fact that Alabama was very close to not even making the Playoff at all, and that their inclusion by the committee was rather controversial at the time, and something that many viewed as a big mistake. Now that the season is over and we have access to the results, I think it’s worth revisiting this decision by the committee, as doing so will better help us understand how they operate, why that decision was made, and whether we were wrong to create so much controversy over the inclusion of a team that would eventually become National Champions.

The Lead-Up: How We Got to Alabama vs Ohio State

For much of the season, it was a reasonable assumption that Alabama would make the playoff. They started the year on a tear, absolutely destroying everyone they played. They were ranked 1st in the AP Poll from weeks One Through Thirteen straight. They dropped down to five in Week 14. The College Football Playoff Rankings started during Week 10. In these rankings, which would ultimately determine entry into the four team Playoff, Alabama was ranked 2, 2, 1, 1, until they dropped to five in Week 14.

So what happened in Week 14? Up to that point, they seemed like a shoe-in. Well, Alabama lost to their SEC West rival, the Auburn Tigers, 26-14. This was Alabama’s final scheduled game of the season before the SEC Championship Game. Though Alabama would finish the regular season with fewer overall losses than Auburn, they were both  7-1 in conference play, which meant that their head to head matchup would be the tiebreaker for inclusion in the Conference Championship Game. Naturally, having won that matchup, that honor went to Auburn in the West. This put Alabama in the awkward position of, despite having just one loss on the season, not being able to further bolster their case to the committee. Without a Conference Championship game to participate in, they had no games left to play. While other teams could go distinguish themselves in their respective championship games, Alabama, now just looking in from the outside ranked at 5th, would seemingly have to rely on external circumstances to get in. (Nick Saban, recognizing this, wisely began making his case to the committee for Alabama’s inclusion right away.)

I bring this up because the committee needed every possible game available to make their decision. 4 Teams is an awfully small playoff field, and with only 12 to 13 games, depending on the team–I’m not sure why some teams play more games than others–plus conference championship in the College Football season, every game counts. This is especially the case when there are so many good teams. This year was one of the most competitive Top 10s we’ve seen in College Football in awhile. You could have made a case for just about any team in the Top 10 to be included in the playoff. Heck, you could even go further than that. The final CFP Top 16 were as follows: 1Clemson, 2OU, 3Georgia, 4Alabama, 5Ohio State, 6Wisconsin, 7Auburn, 8USC (Pac-12 Champion!!), 9Penn State, 10UMiami, 11Washington, 12UCF (Undefeated on the season!! (and would later go on to defeat Auburn in their bowl game)), 13Stanford, 14Notre Dame, 15TCU, 16Michigan State. You could easily make a case for an expanded playoff field with all those teams, and we very well could be looking at one not far off in the future.

Notre Dame (14Final) was ranked 3rd in the Week 10 and 11 CFP Rankings. UMiami (10Final) was ranked 3rd and 2nd in the Week 12 and 13 CFP Rankings. No team in the final Top 12 had more than 2 losses. It shows how hard it is to pick just 4 teams, and because of that, why even just one loss, especially late in the season, can be exempting. Look at Penn State, for example. They were ranked in the AP Top 5 for Weeks 2 Through 9 of the season. They had a phenomenal year and looked great in their bowl game. But their two losses were to Big Ten East rivals: A 38-39 loss at 6Ohio State (5Final), where OSU’s game winning touchdown came with less than two minutes left, and a 24-27 loss at 24Michigan State (16Final), who kicked a field goal as time expired. Both tight, to the nail losses to quality opponents, the latter of which could have been very different had their not been a 3+ hours long rain delay in the middle of the game. Nonetheless, those losses kept Penn State out of a conference championship, as well as out of the playoff.

So because of this small margin for error when it comes to the playoff, it was reasonable to think that Alabama’s loss to Auburn and lack of Conference Championship would keep them out of the Playoff.  How can you be the best team in the country if you’re not even the best in your conference?

After Bama lost to Auburn, the CFP Rankings looked like this:

  1. Clemson
  2. Auburn
  3. Oklahoma
  4. Wisconsin
  5. Alabama
  6. Georgia
  7. University of Miami
  8. Ohio State

It set up for a fascinating Conference Championship Weekend, which would go a long way in determining who would make the playoff. It truly was (just as ESPN advertised it to be) a fight to the finish. These were the matchups:

SEC Championship: 6Georgia (11-1) vs 2Auburn (10-2)

ACC Championship: 1Clemson (11-1) vs 7Miami (10-1)

Big 12 Championship: 11TCU (10-2) vs 3Oklahoma (11-1)

Big 10 Championship: 8Ohio State (10-2) vs 4Wisconsin (12-0)

Thinking back to this time, there were so many scenarios that could have occurred that it’s hard to keep track of and explain. Teams were most likely out if they lost, but if other teams also lost, they could maybe have snuck back in, depending on who it was that lost. But the simplest way to get in was to win. SEC Champion was guaranteed in. ACC Champion was guaranteed in. Oklahoma and Wisconsin, if they won, were guaranteed in. That would have been the simplest scenario. TCU was probably too low either way. And Ohio State, ranked at 8 was riiighhtttt on the cusp. Recall that Alabama was looking in on the outside, so they needed help. Which meant, based on what I just wrote, that if Oklahoma and Wisconsin won, then Alabama was out of luck.

The simplest scenario almost happened. Clemson blew Miami out of the water, and Georgia comfortably handled Auburn on the neutral field. There go two spots. Oklahoma comfortably handled TCU, there goes another spot. The last spot was there for the taking for Wisconsin. But they faltered and lost the Big Ten Championship 27-21 to Ohio State.

Notice that I’ve made very little, if any, case for Ohio State yet. When the final rankings came out, many people viewed them as slighted because of their Conference Championship. In those peoples’ minds, that Championship (along with other factors, which I’ll get into later), rightly earned them the spot as the Fourth Best Team in the Country. The three other conference championships were determining factors for the other three teams in, so why shouldn’t that be the case for Ohio State too?

This is how the narrative was framed, and it was justifiable once we were at that point. But I think it’s important to look at the big picture and remember how we got there, and I think once we do that, this narrative starts to look a little shortsighted. The narrative was that you had these elite teams at the top, and that Ohio State was one of them. But that wasn’t really the case. As I’ve established, the final few weeks gave us a generally very strong top 10 with a lot of possible scenarios and a lot of contenders vying for spots. When you look at the entirety of the season, there was a group of elite contenders at the top as generally indicated by both the AP Polls and the CFP Rankings. Those teams were Clemson, Georgia, and Alabama. Auburn rightfully put itself in that conversation with its dominant wins over both Georgia and Alabama. I think it’s useful to look at their Iron Bowl win as them essentially switching places with Bama. It both served to elevate their own standing (that they beat someone as good as Bama) while simultaneously lowering that of Bama (maybe Bama’s not as great as we thought). But their loss to Georgia in the Championship proved that they’re not the same team on the road, and that re-opened the door for Bama.

So Clemson, Georgia, and Bama–>Just Kidding Auburn–>Just Kidding Actually Bama were always the top dogs. Oklahoma too, put itself in that conversation because, well, despite a bad defense, Baker Mayfield was generally unstoppable. Then there was, in my opinion (and I think it’s backed up by the committee rankings) this second tier of contenders. Miami, Notre Dame, USC, etc. They all ended up having losses that showed they weren’t quite ready. And Ohio State was always more teetering on the top of that second tier then being part of the first tier. You could really put the top four Big Ten Teams there. They’re all very good, but are they at the level of Clemson, Georgia, and Alabama/Auburn? So the question then became, did Ohio State deserve to move to the bottom of the first tier (the playoff group) as opposed to the top of the second tier?

Because let’s remember, in the second to last CFP Rankings, Bama was ranked 5th (just looking into the playoff) and Ohio state was ranked 8th (more middling). Yes, I know they had the Conference Championship, but they were the lowest ranked team heading into Championship Weekend besides TCU, and had the most losses as well, tied with TCU and Auburn. But Auburn had the two dominant wins over top dogs Georgia and Bama, which, with a Conference Championship, would have been enough to overlook their two losses.

So when you look at it from this perspective, even with a Conference Championship, Ohio State should never have definitely been in. They were still teetering in the middle. So outside of that simple metric of Conference Championships, something that is very easy to point to and has a ring of prestige to it (as well as the recency bias of it, being the last game of the season played before the playoff), what led to people thinking that 8th ranked Ohio State deserved to be in the conversation with the top teams?

Well, I think the Conference Championship is the main reason, but also look what happened to everyone ranked above them. They beat Wisconsin in that game, so they had to be ranked higher than them. Georgia, with the comfortable win over Auburn, reaffirmed their season-long position as top dog, which also led to Auburn dropping way down. And Miami–who, despite starting the season 10-0 with two primetime blowouts of ranked opponents–the committee was always skeptical of, dropped way down with their meltdown in Clemson, which justified the committee’s hesitance.

So really, what screwed this whole thing up was Auburn. You had top dogs Clemson, Alabama, and Georgia, and then you had Auburn dominantly defeat and knock back both Georgia and Bama on separate occasions. The committee was very high on Georgia and Bama, so by defeating them, the committee was forced to respect Auburn as well. But after the SEC Championship game, Auburn’s loss–their third of the season–gave the committee the rationale to reverse back to their original position of Georgia and Bama being at the top. Enough teams moved around that Ohio State was able to slip into the No 5 position, but it still wasn’t enough for the committee to value them at the level of Georgia, Bama, Clemson, and Oklahoma.

It’s all very complicated, but we have to do our best to break it all down and look at as big a picture possible if we want to understand why what happened, happened.

Ohio State Had a Case

Now that we’ve established what led to Ohio State’s position of being just outside the top (in short: Bama lost to Auburn, Auburn lost to Georgia, Ohio State beat Wisconsin in the Championship, a bunch of other things did and didn’t happen…), let’s look at why so many people thought that Ohio State should have been included in the Playoff. And just to be clear, I’m not shilling for Bama here. Ohio State did have a strong case for inclusion, and there’s a good argument that, at least according to resume, they were a more deserving team than Bama.

1) Ohio State Was the Big Ten Champion.

As I mentioned earlier, the top 3 ranked playoff teams were Conference Champions. If Wisconsin had beaten Ohio State in the Big Ten Championship, they almost certainly would have gotten in as an undefeated Conference Champion. Alabama, on the other hand, didn’t even play in their Conference Championship. So after a week where Ohio State further distinguished itself with a win, and Bama didn’t do anything to change their prospects (they didn’t play), the committee still went with Bama. That is frustrating if you’re an Ohio State fan, and deservingly so.

2) Ohio State had a Stronger Strength of Schedule than Alabama

The committee talks a lot about the importance of strength of schedule. College Football teams, after all, choose which opponents they will play in advance. Ohio State had one more loss than Alabama, but one of those losses was to the Oklahoma Sooners. Buckeyes fans felt that the committee was punishing Ohio State for their strength of schedule. “The committee is making the point [that] wins and losses matter more than resume,” ESPN analyst Jesse Palmer said in response to the final rankings reveal. Ohio State would finish the season with wins over Michigan State, Penn State, and Wisconsin. Two of those teams would finish the season in the CFP Top 10, and Ohio State would add a third top 10 win with their shutout of Pac-12 Champion USC in the Cotton Bowl. Alabama, on the other hand, played LSU (Final17) and Mississippi State (Final23). Their toughest opponent was Auburn, and they lost that game. So according to season ending rankings, Alabama’s best ranked win (Final17LSU) was worse than Ohio State’s worst (Final16 Michigan State).

3) Alabama didn’t look good against quality competition.

Alabama destroyed the nobodies on their schedule. But they seemed to sleepwalk down the stretch against some of their SEC opponents. They beat Texas A&M 27-19, LSU 24-10, Mississippi State 31-24 with a late rally, and of course, their only real quality SEC opponent, the Auburn Tigers, they lost to.

When you put these facts together, it’s clear why Ohio State fans felt slighted. They had a strong schedule and a conference championship to go with it, and instead they lost their playoff spot to Alabama. Many saw this as the committee both a) capitulating to the Alabama name, and b) being biased towards the SEC.

At face value, it seems like Ohio State should have gotten in. And had they, they would have easily been able to justify it. Even so, these facts still don’t tell the whole story.

Ohio State’s Case Wasn’t That Strong

At the end of the day, the question wasn’t whether Ohio State had a case. It was whether that case was strong enough to put them in the competition over Alabama, and it simply wasn’t. Each of the points I just made for Ohio State could be justifiably argued against, as I will do now.

1) Ohio State Was the Big Ten Champion.

Earlier I talked about how the fact that there are so few games in College Football makes the margin for error very small. This applies to Conference Championships too, and nothing shows this better than Alabama’s 2017 season. They were undefeated up until their last game of the season. They lost a tough fight to one of the best teams in the country (and their rival) at one of the hardest places to play (Auburn also beat Georgia in Auburn, 40-17. Bama lost 26-14). Just like that, they’re out of the Conference Championship.

Don’t get me wrong. Everyone wants to be a Conference Champion. And I’m new to College Football so maybe I’m looking at this wrong. But ultimately, Bama wasn’t a Conference Champion because they lost one game (their only loss) at the end of the year. Those are the rules, and if they keep Bama from playing in the SEC Title Game, then fine… but I’m not sure it should undermine the fact that Bama was one of the best teams in the country for the entire year.

Even better though, let’s look at Ohio State. Yes, they won a conference championship. But it was only by the margin of 27-21. And if you watched that game, you got the sense that it could have been by a lot more. Wisconsin was more or less sleepwalking through that game. And they still took it to the very end. I think if Ohio State had gone out and destroyed Wisconsin, they would have had a much better case for going in. But they didn’t. When you’re that low in the rankings, you need to make as strong a case as possible, and I’m just not sure Ohio State did that.

2) Ohio State had a Stronger Strength of Schedule than Alabama

This is another point that is a bit overblown, in my opinion. Yes, it’s true, but I’m not sure the difference was significant enough to merit Ohio State’s inclusion.

Ohio State lost to Oklahoma, yes, but that wasn’t the loss that doomed them. It was their 55-24 loss to unranked Iowa in November. That’s a 31 point loss to an unranked team. Yes, there are weaker teams in college football, but it’s still unacceptable. That showed the committee that they simply couldn’t trust Ohio State to play with the big boys. You need to beat who you’re supposed to beat, and you need to be consistent on a week to week basis. Alabama has a record 73 straight wins against unranked teams. There is a zero percent chance they would have lost to Iowa. Zero.

Furthermore, Ohio State had their fair share of nobodies on the schedule. They played Army and UNLV early in the year, as well as all the little brothers of the Big Ten (Rutgers, Maryland, Nebraska, Illinois, etc).

Also, we have to mention that Alabama, in their opener, pummeled Florida State, during the only 3 1/2 quarters of the season when they had their starting QB healthy.

3) Alabama didn’t look good against quality competition.

But the same could be said for Ohio State. Yes, their wins against Penn State and Michigan State were impressive. As I said, they really weren’t that impressive at all in the championship vs Wisconsin. And what about their 31-20 win vs Michigan? I watched that game, and it was hardly dominant either–despite the fact that Michigan had zero offense last year. John O Korn had two straight drives to push for a go ahead TD and just threw the game away. On the first, he lost his composure under pressure and threw a jump pass (for no reason), missing a wide open man on 4th and 2 around midfield. On the next, he lobbed an INT straight to the safety on the first play of the drive with plenty of time in the pocket. A replay showed it was clearly the wrong read.

Sure, throw out the records when it’s Michigan/Ohio State, but the same can be said for LSU/Alabama. Mississippi State as well. The fact of the matter is that both of these teams had arguments counting against them, and Ohio State’s argument for simply wasn’t strong enough to push them in over Alabama. They had a case, and it would have been fine if they got in, but their case certainly wasn’t strong enough that people should have been getting as upset as they did.

The Committee’s Reasoning Made Sense

After Ohio State got left out, there was a lot of criticism surrounding the College Football Playoff committee and their process. That they’re too inconsistent, that they’re not holding themselves to the standards they set out, that they can’t justify their decisions, etc.

But at the end of the day, if you listen to what they said, they gave perfectly logical justifications for their inclusion of Alabama.

1) Alabama was consistently a top team over the course of the year.

This is something I addressed earlier in this post–it’s crucial to look at the rankings over the course of the season, and when you do that, it’s clear that the committee (who watches each of these teams each and every week) consistently viewed Alabama as a top football team. Here’s Kirby Hocutt of the CFP Committee the day of the rankings release:

“We spent a great amount of time last night into the morning, again beginning at 7:30 this morning, talking about the full body of work. Now that the complete season is in front of us, we have the full body of work. The selection committee just favored Alabama’s full body of work over that of Ohio State. And it was consistent over the course of the year. As we saw Alabama play week in and week out–our rankings show, when we start with a clean sheet of paper each and every week, that the selection committee believed that Alabama was the better Football team.”

2) The Iowa loss mattered.

When you see Ohio State fans say that Ohio State didn’t get in because they played a stronger schedule and that they should schedule weaker opponents in order to get in, it’s somewhat absurd because it totally ignores the Iowa loss. Iowa wasn’t a ranked team. So that loss didn’t have anything to do with strength of scheduling. Yes, Ohio State also lost to Oklahoma, but that wasn’t the deciding factor. Replace Oklahoma with an easy win on that schedule, keep everything else the same, including the Iowa loss, and the committee’s decision is very much likely to be the same. Or, take away the Iowa loss, and both Bama and Ohio State have one loss to ranked opponents, and in that case Ohio State probably gets in. So although strength of schedule did favor Ohio State, it’s also not what kept them out, and shouldn’t be mentioned as such. Heres Hocutt echoing the point:

“The selection committee looked at a one loss Alabama team, that one loss coming against the final ranking No 7 team Auburn in a very competitive game; we compared that to a 2 loss Ohio State team, obviously the one loss at home to the No 2 ranked Oklahoma, but more damaging was the 31 point loss to unranked Iowa.”

3) In this case, resume was a tiebreaker that wasn’t needed, not the deciding factor.

This is the one people struggle with the most. “How can you leave out a Conference Champion Ohio State team?”, they ask. The answer is that the committee’s agenda first and foremost is to pick the best teams on film. Things like conference championship, strength of schedule, are mere tiebreakers when the film isn’t clear. But in this case, the film was clear, so the tiebreakers weren’t needed. Therefore, it didn’t matter that Ohio State was a Conference Champion. Says Hocutt:

“Our charge is very simple. Our charge as the selection committee is to identify the four very best teams in the country for participation into the semifinals. And when there are close separation between teams, then we’re instructed to look at certain criteria. In this case, the margins weren’t close enough for us to look at those matters. […] Our charge is very clear: The four very best teams, and Alabama is included in those teams this College Football Season.”

4) So Conference Championships Don’t Matter?

This is another overreaction you heard a lot. No, they do. Three of the teams were Conference Champions. Usually, most of the time, the best teams will be Conference Champions. But sometimes they aren’t. Ohio State should know this better than anyone else. They were selected for inclusion two years ago over conference Champion Penn State. The committee chose Ohio State over Penn State, despite the latter’s championship and the former’s lack thereof, because they believed Ohio State was the better team. No Ohio State fan who supported that decision can rationally be upset by this one. Again, here’s Hocutt explaining the matter:

“We look at the four very best teams. Conference Championships are important. If you look at the history of the CFP Playoffs, 14 of the 16 teams have been Conference Champions. But however, we have the flexibility and the discretion to put non-champions in the top 4 if they are one of the four very best, and that’s what took place last night [and] was confirmed this morning.”

The job of these guys is to pick the best team on film. If you believe that, after watching film, Ohio State was the best team, then so be it. Go make your case. But for the most part, that’s not the argument you’re hearing. You’re hearing the argument I outlined above. But the fact that the Ohio State Bukeyes were Conference Champions and played a tougher schedule, doesn’t make them the best team on film. It might make them more deserving or more accomplished, and that’s something we can argue. But that’s not what this system is about. Here’s ESPN Analyst and former player Booger Macfarland after hearing the decision:

“The initiative of the College Football Playoff Committee is to get the four best teams. I think we in the media try to figure out different ways to make it easy for people at home to come to that conclusion. We come up with all these different formulas, all these different numbers. Let’s go back to the beginning what it’s about: It’s about the four best teams.”

It Will Never Be 100% Consistent

At the end of the day, you can’t quantify all this stuff. There are simply too many factors. So it’s not entirely accurate to say that film is the only thing that plays a role. If you’re an undefeated conference champion, you’re going to get in. There are things you can do to control your own destiny. If you play good teams, dominant your opponents, and win, you’re going to get in. Not necessarily all those things at the same time. But it’s why Wisconsin and Miami would have been in with Conference Championship Wins. They would have been 1 loss and 0 loss Conference Champions. It’s why Auburn would have been in with 2 losses–because they would have been Conference Champions with 2 wins over top teams.

But there are also things you can do to take destiny out of your own hands. When Ohio State lost by 31 to an unranked team, they took destiny out of their own hands. It’s not just that they lost. It’s that they lost by 31, and that it was to an unranked team. But let’s be clear: When Alabama took themselves out of Conference Championship contention, they took destiny out of their own hands too. It wasn’t just Ohio State.

At that point, you had two teams that didn’t make clear cases for themselves. So when that’s the case, it’s purely up to the committee and what they think by watching film. And they thought Alabama was better.

This isn’t bullshit. Let’s not treat it as such. No one liked the BCS. No one wanted a formula. Football is too subjective. This was an attempt to make the system and the competition as good as possible. And while there will obviously be blips along the way, it’s hard to argue with this year’s results. And ultimately, that is why we should be optimistic about the committee and trust their process going forward.

The Bottom Line: Was Alabama one of the Four Best Teams?

How many times have I used the phrase “four best teams” in writing this article? That’s what’s been drilled into my head the more I listen to the committee, to Kirk Herbstreit, to people who talk about the CFP and understand the system. That’s what it’s about. So at the end of the day, Alabama was the right choice if they were one of the four best teams. So were they?

I’m not a big fan of using results to justify the process. In fact, I think it’s one of the biggest problems in sports (and politics, and society in general…). But with this, it’s different. The only way to say if Alabama was one of the four best teams is if they beat the other top teams. And that’s exactly what they did.

Look, we won’t ever know how Ohio State would have done if they had gotten in. We can guess, but we can’t say for sure. But we do know how Alabama did. And the results speak for themselves.

It’s funny looking back at the youtube comments on the final CFP rankings reveal video. Everyone was saying Alabama would get destroyed by Clemson. I mean, I think we forget with how high a regard this Clemson team was held. They were considered by many, including the committee, to be the best team in the country. Alabama beat them 24-6 in the semifinal. And we know what happened next. Bama came back down 20-7 to beat Georgia in OT. In the same way that Oklahoma’s offense stalled late in the game when it played Georgia in the Rose Bowl, Georgia’s offense stalled late in the game in National Championship. At the end of the day, Alabama’s defense is the gold standard, and they can play with absolutely anybody.

Sure, there were a lot of things that could have gone differently in that game, like in any Football game. But it wasn’t a fluky win (like Super Bowl 51 was, but that’s another conversation…). Bama was dominant in every facet of the game, and they earned the win.

If you can look me in the eye and tell me that you’re positive that Ohio State, after barely beating Wisconsin, could have gotten through Clemson and Georgia in the way that Alabama did, then by all means, more power to you. But I have trouble that most people could really believe that.

At the end of the day, the CFP Committee got it right. Their job was to pick the best teams, and that’s exactly what they did.

Why bring this up now?

Because no one would shut up about it, that’s why!

The CFP is broken! The committee is corrupt! ESPN is a joke! Bla bla bla…

Look, I’m not saying it was a no brainer. Heck I just spent over 5000 words writing about it. There’s obviously a ton that went into this and a ton to talk about. It’s something I myself struggled with a lot.

But it’s worth looking back. For one, because it’s simply an interesting exercise to reflect on process, evaluate what we were right and wrong about, what went into it, and how we can learn from it. But two, because going forward, the committee showed that, despite how upset everyone got, it made the right decision, and because of that it deserves our trust.

I’m not saying don’t question the committee. I’m not saying don’t keep having conversations about this moving forward. Absolutely do. At the same time, this was a decision that perplexed a lot of people at the time it was made. Now, with the season past us, hopefully having this discussion has made some things more clear in retrospect, and will allow us to better understand the process the next time something like this happens.

And let’s also remember, the next time people get upset and say that the CFP committee doesn’t know what they’re doing, that at the end of the day they put a team in that many people thought they shouldn’t, and that team went on to win a National Championship. Maybe they know some things that we don’t.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Click here for Archives